Mary Lynn in Indianapolis sent me this link to a video story about 89-year-old Rachel Veitch and her 1967 Mercury Comet Caliente.
She's the original owner, and she's put all 540,00o miles on the car's original engine.
While I don't doubt that Ms Veitch is a safe and skillful driver, I was chilled by her description of her last license renewal -- at age 85. The state renewed her license for five more years, without any kind of test. The clerk told her "the elderly" objected to testing, claiming discrimination. That's scary.
I remember a few years back, driving along in some South Carolina city, when an octogenarian woman driving in the adjacent lane sort of drifted into mine, very gently bonked against the side of my car, drifted back into her lane and drove on. She apparently was unaware we'd "contacted" each other. I had son Jonathan and a couple of his Boys' State friends in the car, so we didn't go chasing...
I'm ambivalent about "the elderly" behind the wheel. I'm still a few years away from Rachel Veitch's age, and I'm convinced that I'm as good a driver as I ever was. Never mind that my neck doesn't twist quite as easily as it did 20 years ago, or that I can't always hear the turn signal clicking. I'm doing just fine, thank you. And I should be able to drive as long as I'm able.
Rachel Veitch is right about one thing, for sure. "Able" should include "safe." One way to help ensure safety is to require regular testing at renewal for all -- with shorter renewal and testing frequencies for higher-risk drivers.
Remind me in 25 years that I said that.